The Elite Forum

The Big Three Plus One => GoldenEye 007 => Topic started by: Boss on September 07, 2005, 02:54:00 am

Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on September 07, 2005, 02:54:00 am
For all these WRs I'll assume you are using NTSC (PAL on Train).





Updated April 17th, 2006

1. Bunker 1 0:17
2. Frigate 0:23
3. Runway 0:22
4. Control 4:00
5. Train 1:05
6. Streets 1:13
7. Bunker 2 0:24
8. Aztec 1:34
9. Silo 1:05
10. Statue 2:20
11. Dam 0:53
12. Cradle 0:34
13. Egyptian 0:46
14. Surface 1 1:03
15. Jungle 0:53
16. Archives 0:16
17. Surface 2 0:51
18. Facility 0:47
19. Caverns 1:03
20. Depot 0:26





Updated April 17th, 2006

1. Silo 1:12
2. Control 4:13
3. Bunker 2 0:49
4. Depot 0:43
5. Dam 1:18
6. Aztec 1:42
7. Jungle 0:57
8. Frigate 1:03
9. Train 1:29
10. Caverns 1:23
11. Statue 2:20
12. Facility 0:56
13. Surface 1 1:50
14. Cradle 0:36
15. Bunker 0:23
16. Archives 0:55
17. Egyptian 0:47
18. Streets 1:56
19. Surface 2 0:55
20. Runway 0:23





Updated April 17th, 2006

1. Depot 0:50
2. Jungle 0:58
3. Caverns 1:42
4. Bunker 1 1:07
5. Aztec 1:49
6. Train 1:56
7. Control 4:17
8. Silo 1:31
9. Frigate 1:11
10. Dam 2:00
11. Statue 2:20
12. Facility 0:56
13. Bunker 2 1:06
14. Surface 1 1:50
15. Cradle 0:36
16. Archives 0:55
17. Egyptian 0:47
18. Surface 2 1:32
19. Runway 0:38
20. Streets 1:56
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 07, 2005, 10:20:00 am
24 may be beaten soon, but it doesn't deserve such a bad spot imo. 47 facility is much easier than 24..
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 07, 2005, 01:37:00 pm
Good list there Bryan, Very accurate.

35 cradle should probably be below 24 frigate too, It's a pretty easy wr and requires less luck than frigate.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on September 07, 2005, 02:32:00 pm
24 Is pretty easy speed wise, but hostages can make it a pain.

Since it is so *luck* Based i would rate it higher, a few places at least anyways.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 08, 2005, 03:55:00 pm
I think the opposite. If you play some <good> hours on frigate, with constant 24 fails (which shouldn't be hard to get), you'll eventually get the WR. Anyone with decent skill and good patient can theorically achieve that.

On the other hand, the skill-based levels WRs will only be achieved by really good players; well, sometimes they'll need some kind of luck, but on those levels the skill is the most important factor.

For example: you won't get 22 runway in 10 minutes, but you may get 24 frigate in 10 minutes.

Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 08, 2005, 04:23:00 pm
don't let luck fool you though, patience/endurance is an important skill factor.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 08, 2005, 10:35:00 pm
Nah, to get a Frigate 24, for example, you'll need, besides the mediocre skill, two things:

1. An incredible patience
2. Free time

Sorry, but that's not game skill at all. I'd like to see your point of view though.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 08, 2005, 10:39:00 pm
I have both those.
1. An incredible patience
2. Free time

But im guess i don't have mediocre skill, because i've never failed a 24.:x
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 08, 2005, 10:46:00 pm
:lol  Mediocre is not the correct word for that, sorry. Something like constant and good at the same time, but not like <that> good.

24 speed = good
23 speed = really good.

Use that.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Cervone on September 09, 2005, 01:20:00 am
I don't feel like ranking them, so I'll just put some of my thoughts down instead.

Agent:

Dam 53 - Still a great record even though it is "common" by today's standards - as Bryan pointed out, it's overplayed. The bottom line is that watching a 53 run never really gets old.
Facility 47 - Not a bad time, but I'd say most people that have 48 could get 47 without that much effort, especially since using 2 mines for the last tanks is quite easy almost all 48 vids use only 2 mine boosts (instead of 4 like the 47 runs have).
Runway 22 - A fantastic time, but the availability of boosts makes this record seem more feasible than its cousin, bunker 17. I could imagine a few more players getting this if they put in the time.
Surface 1 1:03 - This is a bad level to compete for fast times on. I'm not going to complain about the strength of 103 as a record, but nobody likes a level where you have to sit on your ass, bored out of your mind with nearly all of your success depending on the last few seconds.
Bunker 1 17 - Nobody's tried seriously besides Wouter. I base the strength of this record on that I find 18s pretty hard, and imagining an extra second off of the average 18 run is surely testing the limits of the game.
Silo 1:05 - I've never liked/been good at Silo, but I respect this time quite a bit. It's very easy to lose time on Silo, and when you look at the run as a whole, Bryan really lost very little on his 1:05. Nevertheless, other players could surely do this record.
Frigate 24 - There's been enough said about this record so far in the topic.
Surface 2 0:52 - This is in the same category as the other Surface level, but 52 is much less impressive since the one part of the level that matters (the mine toss) is much less skill-oriented than the locks on S1. 51 would be pretty cool, though.
Bunker 2 0:24 - There still is quite a bit to learn about this level. I think it's safe to say that Bryan was very lucky to have gotten 24 under his circumstances. Although I think this record is weaker than the other top 3-4 agent records, it is unique in that there are many top players for which this time is just about impossible (*remembers Jimbo swearing 25 was maxed* :b   ).
Statue 2:20 - Indeed, this record is certainly a notch or two harder (whatever that means 8o   :smokin   ) than 2:20 on SA/00. The Trev shot is a total bitch, boosts are more rare, so in the end 2:20 is a very admirable time.
Archives 16 - Like Dam 53, a 16 run never gets old to watch. However, the level is simple enough that getting great starts consistently (*points at Greg Lewis*) would put  you in a good position for getting 16.
Streets 1:13 - A great record, but within the upper echelon of the agent records (of which 1:13 certainly belongs), I'd say that this is the most feasible for the largest number of players. That's not meant to detract from the strength of the record; it's merely a result of a fairly chaotic level where lag and (obviously) boosts become huge factors that don't discriminate based on the overall skill of the player.
Depot 0:26 - By far the easiest agent record right now. It is essential to master your motion in and through the building after the train shot, but once this has been achieved, 26 is all but guaranteed.
Train 1:07 - This could be taken significantly lower, but it's an extremely complex level by normal agent standards, with a high amount of skill involved. 1:07 may not be an amazing record, but suffice it to say that it takes serious ability to achieve.
Jungle 0:53 - It's not very easy to get good runs often on Jungle, but the bottom line is that 53 isn't special. Solid, yes, but 52 should (and probably will) happen fairly soon.
Control 4:00 - A hard one to judge. On the one hand, Bryan's run looked very nice. On the other, there are still many mysteries/random factors/tricks in the level that could be utilized. Either way, 4:00 is a great feat and only a small few top players have any shot at this.
Caverns 1:03 - This time is kind of like the advanced version of Streets 1:14. A much more intricate pathway to follow, significant guard gayness... but in the end, all 1:03 boils down to is clean strafing and a few boosts.
Cradle 0:35 - I hate everything about Cradle. I really don't know much about this record, and I take pride in having never tried for it at all. ;)    It seems like this record might have potential to become common, though, if for some reason people decided to play Cradle agent.
Aztec 1:35 - Bryan summed it up well. Can't say that this is a bad record, but the best strats have not yet been successfully used to their full potential. 1:33ish would be fun to see, and will probably happen sooner rather than later.
Egypt 0:46 - I'll bet Jimbo could make this record look easy if he wanted to. Nevertheless, it's hard to discredit a record that requires the consistency needed for success here.

Secret Agent:

Dam 1:18 - This is a strong record as only a few top players are capable of achieving it. However, success on Dam SA boils down to one (very obvious) thing, and that's alarm technique. With enough practice to build up the ability to get consistent, fast alarms, 1:18 isn't very hard.
Facility 0:57 - I could see this record becoming quite a bit more common if people tried for it, since 57 isn't all that strong. All it takes is a clean run and the proper luck during the ending section.
Runway 0:23 - By far the easiest SA record. Nowhere near as cake as 23 on agent, but with good, consistent beginnings, an eventual 23 is almost certain.
Surface 1 1:50 - Long, annoying level to play. The most important thing to do when trying for this record is to always remember to use lots of good lookdown. With lookdown, good lines, and consistency with some of the hut-related objectives, 1:50 is pretty straightforward. Could become somewhat common if people tried more for it.
Bunker 1 0:23 - A good record, especially since there are still top 10 players that don't even have 25 yet. It's a strange level - one with very little good old, plain strafing. For some, this makes a time like 23 seem like a real bitch; for others, it makes it an easy level to succeed on.
Frigate 1:07 - With the new SA strat now being used, 1:07 is quite poor. Had this strat been used since the beginning, I'd bet the record would be more like 1:03. Still, hostage gayness prevents any frigate record from ever being a cakewalk.
Silo 1:12 - An awesome time. It's kind of similar to Train 1:07 in that it's a great record even though it's far from max, and that many top eliters are still 4ish seconds behind each time.
Surface 2 0:55 - Lame level, lame record. Nobody really plays this level because it's boring as fuck, but even so, 55 is easy enough that good players should give it a couple of tries. 0:54-53, however, would certainly change things.
Bunker 2 0:50 - A great time. It requires a very calm, well-controlled style of play that is very difficult to master without lots of skill and experience. The fact that the rest of the elite is 3 seconds behind, though, is more of a remark on the laziness of the elite than anything else.
Statue 2:20 - The fact that I finally ended Bryan's Statue sweep, and that several other people seem to be closing the gap will probably make 2:19 one of Bryan's first goals if/when he returns to serious GE. Nevertheless, 2:20 is still a hard time to do given the length of the mission, and the luck needed in getting things to work. Many top players still have very low chances at achieving this time.
Archives 0:56 - I'm not aware of anyone that's tried seriously for 56s and hasn't gotten them. A little bit of luck is needed, but for those who can do the start well, 56s should be no big deal.
Streets 1:56 - Experience is needed in order to minimize the time lost around the Val area, but besides for that, not much else is needed for this record other than patience for a good boost ratio. Could become common (if it isn't already).
Depot 0:43 - Personally, I think this time is quite a bit overrated (most likely because it was Wouter's first untied in a long time, that kind of stuff). The train shot is not nearly as daunting as it used to be - there are quite a few players that claim 60ish% or better success rates with the train shot. If this is the case, 0:43 requires little more than a clean strafing and (of course) complete objectives. However, that aside, only a handful of players even have 44, and 43 is a fairly huge step up from that.
Train 1:43 - The main thing this record has going for it is that train is a bitch of a level (personally, I think SA is the biggest bitch of all the train difficulties). That aside however, 1:43 does not need a very good run. This record should be fairly straightforward for people with enough patience to power through the level until the right run happens.
Jungle 0:57 - This is a very good record and very hard to do, but I would hesitate from calling 57 fully satisfying. The skill level needed puts this record out of reach for a great number of top gamers, but full ownage of this level has not happened yet.
Control 4:13 - 4:13 is absolutely out of the question unless you are highly skilled in nearly all aspects of the game and very experienced on Control. That aside, however, the record is still quite improvable for those who meet the aforementioned criteria (as of right now, that probably only includes me and Bryan ;)  , but that will change eventually).
Caverns 1:23 - People tend to regard tied records as of lesser quality than untieds, but 1:23 is probably just as good/better than a lot of the current untieds. True, it's still very improvable, but only a few players are capable of 1:23.
Cradle 0:36 - The best cradle record, but I don't think that's saying much. There's a whole mountain of gayness to overcome in getting 36. Jimbo doesn't think much of it, but then again, Jimbo doesn't think much at all, really. All in all though, I'd bet 36 on Cradle stays rare for a long time.
Aztec 1:45 - This level has certainly not been given proper justice. 1:45 isn't necessarily bad, and it's certainly not easy to do, but the potential for improvement is too great to consider 1:45 as anything more than an average record at best.
Egypt 0:47 - Whatever. I'm hungry and want breakfast. Who cares about Egypt anyway...

00 Agent:

Dam 2:00 - It's frustrating to have a record so close to breaking the 2:00 barrier, but the truth is that 2:00 is a good time that's hard to beat. As Bryan pointed out, once you have runs in the 1:59-2:01ish range, survival is a lot more difficult than on 2:04ish runs. Throw in some not too easy objectives and a long mission length, and 2:00 is not something many can do.
Facility 0:57 - This is quite a bit harder than its SA counterpart, since one must be much more careful with things like ammo use and mine boosts. The guards are gayer, too. Still, 57 is not a large stretch if you already have 58, so this record isn't special.
Runway 0:38 - Nobody has ever tried for this record (and that's including Bryan ;) ). However, like Bryan said, 38 should be possible with 2 boosts and left strafe to the key, coupled of course with good strafing and ending. 38 has been untied for quite some time, but given the simplicity of the level and cakiness of 39, it would be very surprising to see several people not get 38 if they tried for it.
Surface 1 1:50 - Same description as SA, and about the same difficulty as SA. True, it's a bit easier to get boosts, but surviving the level is not a guarantee on 00.
Bunker 1 1:07 - Bryan was pretty lucky to get this, since it's very uncommon to get all the luck to go your way (nades, Boris, etc) on this level. Although 1:07 might not be maxed, I think that right now only Wouter and Jimbo have the b1 experience needed for this record.
Silo 1:32 - Nowhere near max, but 1:32 is still quite hard to do considering the chaos of Silo, and the challenge of survival on 00A. There are several eliters that could definitely do this record, but Silo is an overplayed level and it's a testament to 1:32's strength that is has remained untied by 2 seconds for as long as it has.
Frigate 1:13 - It's difficult to get this record to as low as it can realistically go, so 1:13 is really only a tiny step in the right direction. However, there is lots that can go wrong on this mission, and getting all the way back to the boat on a good run is more rare than it used to be. 1:13 is alright considering the small amount of attempts that have been made at it, but expect this record to fall by a lot once the hours of play start to pile up.
Surface 2 1:32 - The hardest part of this record is having the patience to wait for nades, and the level-headedness to perform well on runs when nades do come. Speedwise, 1:32 is weak. Many mistakes can be made and still allow for lower than 1:32. It's a very frustrating level to play, but that won't stop this record from plummeting into the 1:20s when all the right parts fall into place.
Bunker 2 1:06 - A ridiculously complicated level, and for that reason 1:06 is by no means easy. Yet, a serious effort on the mission could bring this lower by up to several seconds.
Statue 2:20 - A little bit easier than SA due to the increased likelihood of boosts, but the aspects of this record are no different.
Archives 0:56 - Same as SA, but guards can be slightly gayer, and more care is needed with ammo use. These, however, are only minor alterations from SA 0:56.
Streets 1:56 - Same as SA. Boosts are a bit easier to get, but the Val area becomes harder to do.
Depot 0:50 - An awesome record that could stay untied for a very long time. 51 (although much weaker than 50) was untied for like 900 days, so it's safe to say Wouter destroys the competition on Depot 00. A clean run with very fast box shots is needed. Couple that with the difficulty of completing the objectives, and the lag accompanying the train shot, and 50 is very hard to do.
Train 2:11 - Bryan overrated this by quite a bit in his original post (which he then edited). The strength of this record is that much of the elite is still may seconds behind, and that Train is a difficult level to survive through to the end. The weakness of this record is that a relatively clean run with an aggressive ending (not easy to do) could easily take this record lower. I think of 2:11 as an average 00A record.
Jungle 0:58 - Jungle 00 is extremely hard to survive, and just as hard--if not harder (getting a good Xenia kill)--to complete all the objectives. That said, it's hard to ask for better than the run that caused 0:58, flukishly good even for Wouter.
Control 4:17 - As a record, this is considerably weaker than both 4:00 and 4:13, but it's still almost as hard to do as either of those records given the gayness of 00 Agent. Don't expect this record to get too close to SA, but 4:17 will definitely be lowered (however, only experts need apply).
Caverns 1:42 - An infamous, brutal mission with guards from hell and objectives from Jimbo's bedroom. 1:50 runs are rare enough, so the extra speed needed for 1:42 is nearly impossible for even most of the best players. 1:42 is by no means humanly maxed, but only experts have any shot at lowering it.
Cradle 0:37 - Dunno, this record is probably gay.
Aztec 1:55 - The most accurate and powerful guards in the game plus a ridiculous amount of required luck probably make this level the most difficult to both finish/complete AND survive in all of GE. That said, however, 1:55 is very, very far from its max. It won't be easy, but don't be surprised if when 1:55 gets beaten, it gets beaten by a lot.
Egypt - Same as SA. :b
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 09, 2005, 10:21:00 am
I dare YOU to play seriously for bunker 17 and report your findings :p

As for saying that several of these will be beaten soon, what do you consider soon? unless you're planning on beating those yourself, soon must mean something like "within the next 5 years".
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 09, 2005, 01:20:00 pm
:lol

Yeah, your patience is unbelievable, but I agree with Dan on that one. If any of the top players put the same ammount of effort into it, I can't see why Bunker 17 wouldn't be tied.

You're not better - neither worse - than anyone here, Wouter.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 09, 2005, 02:03:00 pm
Actually I am. Plus there's a lot of little things you need to know to make things happen, needing luck or not. It isn't for no reason that people have various IQ levels.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 09, 2005, 02:08:00 pm
Wasn't there a thread a few years ago where several eliter's made an iq test?

Could be fun to do that again :p  

Even though i'm quite sure most poeple around here has a fairly high iq level.

Btw, nice SA/00A lists too Bryan. Though i'd probably rank 1:07 B1 higher than Silo 00A.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 09, 2005, 03:49:00 pm
I hope you were being sarcastic, Wouty.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on September 11, 2005, 12:48:00 am
Yeah, your patience is unbelievable, but I agree with Dan on that one. If any of the top players put the same ammount of effort into it, I can't see why Bunker 17 wouldn't be tied.

You're not better - neither worse - than anyone here, Wouter.


Of all people to say this, you are absolutely as wrong as you can be. Why the hell are you even in this topic anyway?

Now, onto record strength. I will only comment on records which I know a little something about...

Bunker 1 SA 0:23 - If you watch my vid, all it takes is smoooothness and reasonable accuracy. Speed is not a huge factor, which blows. 0:22 would be an awesome record, but that's like going for 1:17 Dam SA, just so far away...

Bunker 1 00A 1:07 - LUCKY. I still have no idea how my run wasn't 1:07 / Bryan's run wasn't 1:08, but I guess it's all in the Boris. 1:06 is doable, just that no one has any clue how to make 1:07 work, let alone getting one second lower.

Silo A 1:05 - Wouldn't be a record I would be against trying for. Silo speed runs are so fun. All you need is smoothness, and on Agent, it's not much to ask for. Doors and strafing are a bigger factor than most think. 1:04 would be insane, Bryan's run had that potential. Honestly, I think only Bryan and I are capable of lower Silo untieds (sorry Wouter).

Silo SA 1:12 - I rank this as the best record in the elite. I don't care how many mistakes you think Bryan had / BRYAN thinks he had, it doesn't matter. Mistakes don't necessarily make your run, it's how you minimize them into the fewest possible. This is the ONLY record where 100% speed, health and pure outright skill and luck are all maximized into one record. It's not untied by 2 seconds for nothing, this is one record that will stay untied for a LONG time.

Silo 00A 1:32 - Same as SA, just magnify the survival rate. Speed here is not such a factor, but minimizing slow situations and capitalizing on bad guards (like me).

Cradle SA / 00A 0:36 / 0:37 - 36 SA is the 2nd worst record in the elite, next to Archives 56. 37 00A isn't much better, but both factor in HUGE patience for Grenades, possibly the  longest wait time for a Grenade out of any level.

Egypt A / SA / 00A 0:46 / 0:47 - Dan's comment on me making this look easy is only based on my consistency with Barons, but NON consistency in deaths and such. All 3 records suck, but are good enough for me not to be able to get 46 A at least. (totally got screwed out of 47 00A, watch my 48 vid once)


Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Cervone on September 11, 2005, 01:16:00 am
Lol.... Cradle 00A 0:37 is better than SA 0:36? That don't make no sense foo
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 11, 2005, 03:16:00 am
36 being 2nd worst record in elite doesn't make sense either, I'd say it's one of the best records.

And 37 00A is not a good record, It's basicly just get a nade and don't screw up. Easy enough. 36 is speed involved which makes things like 300 times harder.

Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 11, 2005, 03:27:00 am
I agree. 36 is pimp for nade strat.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Smit on September 11, 2005, 05:37:00 am
I am working on the 107 On Frigate Bryan ;)  ! I can certainly get 104 at least :)  so..

If no one else is going to get it ?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 11, 2005, 08:59:00 am
heh, B1 sa 22 will be my goal when I play it.

it's funny how you think I can't do any silos even though it's been AGES since I last played it, plus I only tried a little bit of SA on NTSC and caked a 2nd 1:15, but didn't put much effort into it at all. 1:12 will be my goal at LEAST when I go for Silo SA. The only reason 1:12 will  stay untied for a long time (if it even will), is because it isn't even near the top of my to do list. I'm going for better records than 1:12 is. I'd be going for sub 1:12 anyway if I wanted a really good time there to be worthy enough to have a top spot in my to do list.

Surviving silo 00 isn't as hard as is made out to be. I've never had huge problems at all. Caverns 00 is like 10 times as hard.

So cradle sa 36 and arch "?" 56 are the worst records? even though several others are heaps easier to get and are as maxed as these 2? (meaning only 1 second from the absolute max with current strat) I suppose bunker 17 has to be the 3rd worst record since if you just wait out a run with 20 boosts, you'd be bound to get 17, right? What's the problem with people not recognizing that luck makes for an important skill factor(s), being patience/endurance/consistency. if you lack this skill, plenty of records you'll have NO chance of getting, no matter how good you are.

"NON consistency in deaths" - you can't have consistency in getting the luck factors happening, d'oh, it's uncontrollable.

"All 3 records suck, but are good enough for me not to be able to get 46 A at least."
Obviously you're saying you suck yourself there, but that's no news to us. I can't really give any other input, since I haven't played it on advantaged NTSC yet.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on September 11, 2005, 11:41:00 am
OK, watch my Cradle SA 0:37 and tell me 36 is good.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 11, 2005, 12:30:00 pm
oh like, dam 53, runway 22, surface 103, bunker 17, frigate 23 (soon anyway), archives 16, streets 113, are all the worst records in the elite, because "there are HORRIBLE 54s, 23s, 104s, 18s, 24s, 17s, 114s out there".

go on then, get 36, Mr. Bigmouth.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Lecmasta on September 11, 2005, 01:34:00 pm
Jim, I must agree that your 37 SA looks terrible :lol
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on September 11, 2005, 06:05:00 pm
Wouter, I will make a deal with you. The day you get 0:23 B1 SA (which isn't hard, just challenging you), I will go out and get 0:36 at any cost, this is a promise.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 11, 2005, 06:16:00 pm
What if I skip 23 and get 22?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on September 11, 2005, 06:46:00 pm
0:22 would be quite the insanity, I'd rather try tying that record than going for 0:36 though. Grenades make any level horrid.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Laercio-Rodolfo on September 11, 2005, 08:55:00 pm
Huaahuahuhua :lol

Funny comments.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Lecmasta on September 11, 2005, 11:05:00 pm
Greg K's words :

gregk0000: "Of all people to say this, you are absolutely as wrong as you can be. Why the hell are you even in this topic anyway?"

:rollin

I find extremely amazing how you guys think that hours of play determines the guy's skill.

When Wouter did 53 Dam everyone was like OMG CONGRATZ WOUTER, YOU'RE THE BEST GETTING THAT IN A HUNDRED HOURS, as if he was a mental retarded or something. Bryan got it much faster (fluked or not), and nobody gave it a @#%$.

Then he did Bunker 17 (or was it before?) - yes, the most insane time on GE, totally agreed with that. But has anyone here put 180 straight hours on that level? That's like 6h a day for a whole month. No? Well, you still think he's like god because of that.

And hasn't some people failed 17 (one was missing the screen picture)? So what? Is it like when you get the picture it adds 0.2 seconds to your time?

Yes, now you say "OMG YOU DON'T KNOW @#%$ ABOUT GE, GET OUT OF HERE". But I'd like to see anyone here get a GOOD argument.

Normally I wouldn't care about this kind of situation, but you guys look so blind and retarded that I had to say this.

-Greg K
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 11, 2005, 11:15:00 pm
I belive steven claimed a 17 fail, but yeah, his name is Steven Zwartjes. ;) Case and Point.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 11, 2005, 11:31:00 pm
Actually there was a vid and I watched it ;p
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 11, 2005, 11:49:00 pm
If wouter doesn't have this vid i don't belive it, wouter has like 4 failed 17 vids i think too.(i hope your not counting those) :b
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 12, 2005, 03:21:00 am
I'm the only person that has failed 17s on video, for as much is known. All these 17 fails were missing the key.

Obviously simply playing for hours doesn't determine skill. Exactly as much "no skill" as someone that flukes record after record. They both need a normal skill level, but the fluker has the luck going his way and doesn't need patience/endurance/consistency nearly as much as the non-fluker needs, therefor playing it hours before succeeding. It's pretty normal for people to be more happy for someone when that someone gets a record after he went through an enormous long session (total of all playing) than when someone gets a new record in 5 minutes/ 1 hour.

Now, you brought up Bunker 17. I played it for 150 hours to get it. I don't know anyone who ever played any level for 150ish hours to cut off 1 second because his goal is so maxed as this one is and therefor very hard to come by.
Unlike Dam 53, nobody got 17 once when trying to PR on Bunker. Plenty of people have played it. Now, if it was like Dam, surely someone would have got 17 as well, but appearantly it isn't so, so to me that means there are some records that DO require true determination if you really want them, no matter how much skill you have. Determination DOES add to your potential. I don't care if you COULD get 17 if you played for endless hours, the matter of fact is, you WON'T be playing endless hours for it.
It's all about the context, and I suppose you fail to see how it is to be interpreted.

Well that's about as much of an "arguement" as you will get, if you don't understand yet, then there's no way you will ever look at it the way "we" do.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Illu on September 12, 2005, 10:21:00 am
Hundreds of stuff needed to come together before I got Dam A 0:53, depends on how long back you want to look. Well I needed to get born first and stuff, get interested in video games and then maybe I deserved it or maybe I just didn't but got it anyway. Who knows, half of everything is luck and other half is fate and fate is all luck and luck is luck and I'm stupid but yet maybe not.

I was actually down emotionally before I got 0:53, maybe I needed to get that so it's all about balance and things moving around because there are things... ah just rambling.

- The hILARIous Illu ;)

btw, didn't mean no harm with this post just wanted to say something because I'm some kind of person and I'm maybe a retard but whatever, later.

May love be with you or something...
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: wishiwasfamous on September 12, 2005, 11:19:00 am
j00 haev no skeelz iph j00 haev no pr00f...z0rd.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Soft-Hedwig on September 12, 2005, 11:31:00 am
Why are you being such an ass, Wouter?

Arnie
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 12, 2005, 12:09:00 pm
I AM an ass, as would say almost anyone you would ask about me.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 12, 2005, 01:27:00 pm
Quote
Quote:
Now, you brought up Bunker 17. I played it for 150 hours to get it. I don't know anyone who ever played any level for 150ish hours to cut off 1 second because his goal is so maxed as this one is and therefor very hard to come by.


I have played for longer trying for 1:43. Over 200 hours or something(Not all at once though, The last 50 hours has been spread out over the years so it's only 150 hours without breaks. :b
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Cervone on September 12, 2005, 02:33:00 pm
I totally don't believe that, nor do I believe Jimbo's 197 hours on Frigate. I play GE a lot, and I have never spent more than like 30 hours on a PR (that was Dam 53).
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 12, 2005, 03:34:00 pm
that doesn't even count, since 1:43 isn't maxed at all.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on September 12, 2005, 03:44:00 pm
I dont belive jim or henriks hours. though it is possible to believe ive played 40-50 hours on archives agent easily, cause i have like 1400 17s. (based off of math, and averages and @#%$, stopped counting after 500)
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 12, 2005, 03:55:00 pm
Wouter, I didn't know only maxes counted, Must've missed that.

And Dan/Alex, I don't see why it's impossible to play over 100 hours to get a pr. I mean, I did spend 20 hours on Facility 00A 59, NOT overestimated. And 200 hours is as i said kind of split up over the years. Like 2 weeks at some time 3h a day on average, Then another week a month later or something. That easily gives those 50h that was not in one period.
Now at first when trying for 1:43 i spent an entire month ONLY playing that level, I don't know my average hour per day but since it was on summer holiday i usually do 4-5 hours maybe. Add this to 30 days and you've got 150. Of course this could be alot variating, I might be totally wrong on the math and it might even be as low as 100 hours. But in total it should be at least around those 150 hours.
One thing is for sure though, I have put in tons of hours into this wr. I suppose it's pretty hard to imagine for a player like you Dan who usually gets pr's pretty quick. Personally, If i don't have any flow at all i can spend like 10-15 hours on a time like Surface 1 A 1:04(In fact i did).
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: TreAKAHotdog on September 12, 2005, 04:33:00 pm
sig :lol
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on September 12, 2005, 04:35:00 pm
wtf I spent 2 years going for Frigate A 0:25.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Illu on September 12, 2005, 04:36:00 pm
I've felt less sharp at some points and then I often get nothing and don't feel motivated but nowadays I usually only play when I feel that I have the flow or whatever.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 12, 2005, 06:28:00 pm
Henrik, you're the second person to express that you put in a lot of time into some of your records, I admire that. If you keep believing in it, you'll eventually succeed. Right now I'm very close to the 150 hour mark on frigate myself.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 12, 2005, 06:36:00 pm
The longest i've played any level, is prolly silo 00, i estimate about 40-50 hours or so. Those wern't in a row, just overall time on that level.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 12, 2005, 07:57:00 pm
Yeah, patience IS something to be proud of. I kinda admire your style of play, Wouter (I think I said that already). You really deserve the Frigate 23, for example.

The point is: you are affirming that no one else could do B17, if they put the same time/effort as you did. That's just stupid.

Maybe no one could actually go for the record itself, that's true, but saying your skill is above others' is.. wrong.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 13, 2005, 01:58:00 am
Im quite convinced that Wouter's skills are way above most others in the-elite. His ability to stay calm in tricky situations and take big risks on good runs are maybe the most important skills a GE player can have(And of course, Determination). And if you look at vids like Archives 56/Train SA 1:43/00A speedrun etc you'll probably see alot more skill than if you look at the ties(56/1:43).

Quote
Quote:
Henrik, you're the second person to express that you put in a lot of time into some of your records.


Isn't that 3rd? You, Jimbo, Me?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 13, 2005, 11:07:00 am
"The point is: you are affirming that no one else could do B17, if they put the same time/effort as you did. That's just stupid."

I said nobody else will put the same effort into it. I never said nobody else could get 17. Big difference there.
Still, obviously I might be wrong and someone will put as much effort into it, but I kind of assumed if one starts trying for it, he'll find his lucky run sooner than I did. I just think I have about the worst luck from all top players sometimes.
Perhaps my skill isn't "above" others as you put it, but I'm sure as hell that I have a much better knowledge of what is needed to actually get 17, and it isn't as simple as "getting 6 boosts on a smooth run". I guess if knowledge doesn't count for part of your skill, then I'm not more skilled (excluding the determination needed here) :p

"Isn't that 3rd? You, Jimbo, Me?"
I said records :p
I know Bryan put like 70ish (?) hours into Frigate 00 but that's all I remember from 50+ hours put into a PR being claimed around here.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 13, 2005, 09:12:00 pm
Well, I can see you got a good argument, Wouter.

You have good knowledge of levels (B1, on this case), there's no discussion of that. My point was that if someone put the same time you did on Bunker 17, that person'd might get the record.

As you said, it's doubtfull that anyone will do that. But if he did, why wouldn't your record be tied?

I'd say that you're the only one with such knowledge and patient on Bunker, but you've got that because you played it the most. True, ain't it?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 14, 2005, 03:41:00 am
Let me quote myself

"I never said nobody else could get 17."

So obviously 17 would be tied if someone else gets it too :p

I wouldn't just assume that if someone played it simply as much as I did, he/she will get the same knowledge necessairily, nor will he/she necessairily get 17.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 14, 2005, 07:03:00 pm
And you're wrong ;)
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: johnnyintheechocafe on September 14, 2005, 09:46:00 pm
Quote
Quote:
and it isn't as simple as "getting 6 boosts on a smooth run"


why not? :p
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 15, 2005, 02:09:00 pm
I'm wrong about what?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 15, 2005, 04:07:00 pm
"I wouldn't just assume that if someone played it simply as much as I did, he/she will get the same knowledge necessairily, nor will he/she necessairily get 17."
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 15, 2005, 04:09:00 pm
how can I be wrong about something I wouldn't do?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 15, 2005, 08:58:00 pm
....

Explain why do you think that anyone that plays the same ammount of time on Bunker won't tie your record.

You have some extra quality or something?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Laercio-Rodolfo on September 16, 2005, 01:21:00 am
Extra quality... Patience, patience and more patience, I think :)

Nobody get a @#$%&*$ record without this.
0:17 can be tied, of course, but it will be get by an excellent player with... Skill, and, patience, patience and more patience.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 16, 2005, 09:39:00 am
sure I'll let my bro play it for 150 hours see if he gets 17. "anyone can do it" lol sheesh huge luck factors don't sometimes need a huge timespan to get a record for nothing. you can't say that all luck factors will apply whenever you play 150 hours. you can't EVER predict when they will fall together into the same run.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 16, 2005, 09:42:00 am
also it shows how you just ignore parts of my posts or you just don't even know the meaning of the word necessairily. you're stating that anyone that plays 150 hours for bunker 17, MUST have got it after the 150 hours put into it. in your statement, there's not a single thing allowing for the chance it will not happen in that timespan yet. how can you possibly be so ignorant to think that it WILL and HAS to happen within a set timespan every single time anyone tries for it?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 16, 2005, 07:47:00 pm
(I tried to post this earlier but the forum was gay so I'm posting now)

:lol  omfg, you're so retarded.

So if Bryan/Dan/whoever put 150h into Bunker, he won't necessairly get 0:17 because one hundred and fifth hours aren't enough to get it? Are you saying you got a "fluke", WITH 150 HOURS OF PLAY?

For god sakes. You just can't admit that someone could get it faster than you.

Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 16, 2005, 07:49:00 pm
In other words, you're using yourself as a parameter to the record. That's even worse. It's the same as Bryan saying that his Extraction SA/PA records can't be beaten, because they're preety hard to do. Yes, they're really hard to do, but still, just because the best PD/GE player did it, he never said that no one else could, which is perfectly true.

You're acting like that ;)

And on a final note, you're saying that I'm considering 150h a "solid" ammount of time to the record. I never said that, my friend. It's just that it "can" happen either in 250h, 150h or 50h. But for you, it will only happen after the 150h, because that's the time you needed to get it.

Maybe your 17 will never be tied, but acting like it CAN'T BE TIED is just too gay. Sorry.



Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 16, 2005, 07:50:00 pm
@#%$ gay forum
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 17, 2005, 05:51:00 am
lol omg try a reading class I said a million times that 17 is tieable. loser. if you just don't know how to read it's not my problem and you never said before that other timespans were also optional, you were always talking about 150 hours.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Smit on September 17, 2005, 06:19:00 am
Luck guys, its all in the luck factor.. Every player that has 18 can get 17
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 17, 2005, 07:05:00 am
Yea Greg, Wouter never said 17 can't be tied. What he said was that even if a good player puts 150 hours into it doesn't mean that 17 is a guarentee.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Illu on September 17, 2005, 09:29:00 am
Shut the @#%$ up all of you I've @#%$ had it now I'll get every record I want I don't want to hear anymore bullshit from here on if I want a record I get it and @#%$ you all now and I still don't mean any harm even if I'm so @#%$ angry now and I don't even know wtf I'm talking about and wtf I mean with I can get every record I want and I didn't even mean what I said all I'm saying is that you'll now just have to wait and see and maybe someone will get some insanity record soon and now I'm @#%$ had it and just STFU or I'll release my wrath for real :evil  

- Illu's retarded confused wrath :evil  :rolleyes  trying to create balance and now...

- Illu's Soul :|
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on September 17, 2005, 12:37:00 pm
:lol
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 17, 2005, 01:56:00 pm
Meh, I just found out that Ezboard won't accept big posts. Anyway.

"I wouldn't just assume that if someone played it simply as much as I did, he/she will get the same knowledge necessairily, nor will he/she necessairily get 17."

It looks like I can't interpretate sentences. So let me ask: would you assume that with less than 150 hours a top player can get the same knowledge on the level? If not, why?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on September 17, 2005, 03:57:00 pm
yes a top player could. other smart players could probably volunteer as well.

I should also add, having the knowledge for what is needed to get 17 doesn't mean you will get 17, nor having all the luck needed for 17 will get you 17 if you screw it up because you lack knowledge or skill ;)
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: vitor on September 18, 2005, 11:38:00 am
Yeah, now we are agreeing here.

I just was understanding that people could not have the 'knowledge' playing as much as you did. But now you just said that it's not what you meant, so it's ok.

Thanks.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on September 24, 2005, 06:48:00 pm
38 could be a 1.2 only wr, compareing the strat thats used for 38 to whats possible with 1.1 cruise.:
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Illu on September 25, 2005, 07:53:00 am
Unless someone can pull of the strat with 1.1 uncruised, or the regular 1.1 cruise strat with perfection, though yeah as it looks now I'm very doubtful that anyone will do 38 with 1.1.

I actually did a few 3 boost run fails that ended up in 39 so 3 boosts is needed most likely and probably a very smooth run otherwise too.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 06, 2005, 07:31:00 pm
It's nice to see this updated, especially with 7 (?) new WRs since last update.  I thought it would be cooler though to have all 60 ranked on the same list.  It would be hard to do, but w/e.

Here, I'll start:

1. Bunker 1 - 0:17 A
59. Runway - 0:23 SA
60. Depot - 0:26 A

yea, seems hard.  Maybe we all could do it and make a points system or something, so we could have like "GE elites top 60 records" or something cool.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on December 07, 2005, 03:29:00 am
Yeah, I haven't even though much about doing a top 60 since that would be so hard to do.  I'd defintely need a lot of input from other players, at least most in the top 10 or so.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on December 07, 2005, 04:25:00 am
Maybe it's just me but i think Depot 0:50 deserves at least the 2nd spot, Or even 1st. It's the record that is most likely to stay untouched(So many years and no one has even done 51 yet meh) and Wouter's run was easily the best run i've ever seen in GE/PD.

Oh btw, Archives 56 is easier than runway 23, at least on ntsc.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on December 07, 2005, 05:03:00 am
56 easier then 23 for sure
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on December 07, 2005, 06:25:00 am
yeah, I was thinking Depot 50 should go higher too, it's least likely to be beaten. Caverns can still have several seconds come off and isn't really that hard but more of a patience thing, Jungle would be the only other contender for top spot.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: silver angel on December 08, 2005, 04:08:00 pm
That would be indeed great if all top ranked players (in the top 10 or so) could do a ranking of all WRs. I much appreciated Bryan's list (and didn't even thanked him for this before...Thank you Bryan...*looks down*), but a ranking with all records mixed together would be nice too!
However, I know it's not that much easy and that it would take time, but...If you could achieve this, that would really rocks! :p
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on December 08, 2005, 04:31:00 pm
Sketchy list for now - From MY Point of view, and its a bit biased on levels i suck at, which are ranked higher

Agent

1 - Bunker 17
2 - Frigate 23
3 - Runway 22
4 - Streets 113
5 - Control 400
6 - Train 107
7 - Statue 220
8 - Bunker 24
9 - Dam 53 - Who knows how good this really is, I think its pure random if a run gives 53, judging from what ive seen109 - Archives 16
11 - Silo 105
12 - Jungle 53
13 - Surface 103
14 - Egypt 46
15 - Aztec 135
16 - Surface 2 52
17 - Facility 47
18 - Cradle 35
19 - Caverns 103
20 - Depot 26

Secret Agent

1 -
2 - Dam 118
3 - Depot 43
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 - Aztec 144
15 - Streets 156
16 - Egypt 47
17 - Frigate 105
18 - Facility 57
19 - Runway 23
20 - Archives 56

00 agent

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 Archives 56


yawn, needs work and ill finish it later
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 08, 2005, 07:53:00 pm
if we're going to make a 60 record list, we should start with the bottom 10, since the most amount of people have tried for these records and can give input on them.  Then you progressively go up the list.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on December 08, 2005, 08:46:00 pm
60. Depot A 0:26
59. Runway SA 0:23
58. Caverns A 1:03

I think those 3 can pretty much be locks for those spots.  The 56s/156s would probably come next.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on December 08, 2005, 08:49:00 pm
The true question, what is easyer, 56s or 156s. I would say 156 00 is easyer then all 3 combined.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 08, 2005, 08:52:00 pm
if you can't protect Val well (like me) SA is easier to try it on for.  I don't know how big of a difference there is on 1:56 though.  And I always thought of Surface 2 SA 0:55 as being VERY weak, although again, I can't tell.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on December 09, 2005, 01:19:00 am
Yeah, that would probably be in the same category as 56s/156s.  It could easily have 2 or 3 rows of initials if people actually tried for it.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on December 09, 2005, 04:10:00 am
I used cheats and got 55 on my first try. So yeah, Pretty easy record.

And 56 is much easier than 1:56, Or else i would have 8 1:56's by now instead of 56's.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on December 09, 2005, 05:50:00 am
56 requires no luck and is complete cake, and 156 requires lots of luck with boosts n stuff

Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 09, 2005, 05:53:00 pm
so then

60. Depot A - 0:26
59. Runway SA - 0:23
58. Caverns A - 1:03
57. Archives SA - 0:56 (SA because of ammo issues)
56. Archives 00 - 0:56
55. Streets 00 (?) - 1:56
54. Streets SA (?) - 1:56
53. Surface 2 SA - 0:55

then what?  I think cradle 00 and A maybe.  Not sure
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on December 09, 2005, 06:08:00 pm
imo 103 is harder then 56s
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on December 09, 2005, 07:20:00 pm
I'd say facility 47 is easier than cradle 37, 37 needs more luck. But shouldn't we put more far-from-max records lower than many of the easier but much closer to max ones? Like s2 00 could go much lower, so it should get a bad spot and such. Also, when it's hard to decide which one is easier, often when you include PAL in the picture, it will make things easier to rank, like facility 47/cradle 37 aren't much harder on PAL, but Streets 1:56s would be heaps harder, I think. stuff
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 09, 2005, 07:35:00 pm
lol @ Alex, and yea, this is seeming harder and harder to do.

I guess strength is a combination of how close to max they are, and how hard it is to do them.  For times like S2 1:32, it is actually hard to do, becuase you rarely get nades, and its hard to keep your nerves when you get one.  Plus, once you do get one, you don't want to waste it by shooting through walls and things, so yea, who knows.

so the bottom 12 I guess are those 10 ^ S2 00 and fac 47, but isn't fac 57s easier than 47s?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on December 10, 2005, 08:09:00 am
lol no way, there's no Doak needing to be existant on agent.
don't worry about too many otherwise either, plenty will be beaten yet, so yeah
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on December 10, 2005, 07:22:00 pm
so......

52.  Cradle A - 0:35
51.  Facility A - 0:47 or Surface 2 A - 0:52
49.  Cradle 00 - 0:37
48.  Surface 2 00 - 1:32 (more skill needed than cradle, thus a bit better I'm guessing)
47.  Facility SA - 0:57 (?)

dunno, starting to get tricky here.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on December 10, 2005, 09:33:00 pm
I think Facility SA/00A 57s are worse than A 47, at least on NTSC.  It's hard to say how weak Surface 2 A 52 is until more people play for it.  I can't imagine it being much better than SA 55 though when it comes down to it.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on January 07, 2006, 06:40:00 am
I still think 50 depot is a better and less likely to be a tied wr, then 58 jungle. Both are hard, but i would say 50 is harder and closer to max.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on January 08, 2006, 03:27:00 am
Let's have a poll right here then.  What should be the top records for each difficulty?
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on January 08, 2006, 03:37:00 am
A - Bunker 1 0:17
SA - Silo 1:12
00 - Depot 0:50 AND Jungle 0:58

putting records as equal could fix things up.  After all it is possible to have records be equally strong.  :p

50 is closer to max if not maxed.  Rediculous luck involved.  And the train shot is very gay.  You CAN die, although a bazillion times less often than jungle.

58 is rediculously insane to live.  Xenia is done more than perfectly.  The fact that 58 is worth 70+ points on AGENT, you have to do extra objectives, you die, and xenia is way gayer, makes this absolutely absurd.  It is much less close to maxed than depot, and can go a few seconds lower.

Wouter should decide. He's the one who got them after all.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on January 08, 2006, 06:51:00 am
50 took alot longer wouter said, so im thinking i know what he would say.:b
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on January 08, 2006, 08:12:00 am
I just wish my depot 00 had been 49 so there was no discussion at all ;)
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on January 08, 2006, 09:23:00 am
You could always fix that.:b :lol
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Boss on January 08, 2006, 10:48:00 pm
49 would no doubt > 17.  I guess I can make them tied for now.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: SpiderWaffle on February 13, 2006, 04:41:00 am
I thought silo 00 1:32 was pretty good, considering how long 1:37 was daunted.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: bcks on February 13, 2006, 05:27:00 am
Na, its good, but 130 or 129 should happen, no one has had a super run from begining to end on silo yet. Its prolly the weaker of the 3 silo records.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on February 16, 2006, 01:20:00 am
now that streets SA/00 have been done with 13.1 switch normal strat, and 12.9 switch val strafing, pretty much any run has a shot at 156.  The surface 2 SA/00 records are harder, since its only every 15-20 minutes you have a shot at the WR.  S2 is also much more advanced, complex, and more skill is needed.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Matis on February 16, 2006, 01:27:00 am
EVERY WR IS HARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THATS WHY I HAVE ONE!!!
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: deletedprofile.u on February 16, 2006, 01:29:00 am
Quote
Quote:
pretty much any run has a shot at 156


BULLSHIT.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on February 16, 2006, 01:32:00 am
since my 2 original 156s, I've played that level 30 more minutes.  And I got 2 more 156s.

YOU ARE BULLSHIT MGAY.  STOP MAKING THE STREETS RANKS LOOKED FUCKEDUP!!!!!!!!!!!!

;)
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Infected Mind on February 16, 2006, 02:25:00 am
156s are harder then half the sa/00 wrs:rolleyes
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on March 24, 2006, 08:59:00 pm
1:56s are tough, screw you. Then again, I've never really tried >_<
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on March 24, 2006, 11:46:00 pm
00 took a mere 10 minutes, but sa took almost 100 times as much.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RWG on March 25, 2006, 01:50:00 am
I'd bet archives 16 is harder than jungle 53.  Just archives is much easier to learn/get good at.  If I got jungle 53, just like I got facility 47 and cradle 35 (the other BBGMWJs) then like, 5 other people would get it and we'd all see it's actually weak.

Streets 156s are super cake.  I've done each of them twice. :lol  

hmm..... streets 156 is probably easier than s2 55 simply because of the indesirability of s2 to play.  Makes things hard or something. :smokin
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wyst3r on March 25, 2006, 04:39:00 am
I thought the same thing about Jungle a few months ago and spent like 3 days trying for 53, Soon i realized though, That even with a no stuck run and fast Xenia, You still need a great ending without many backboosts.

Archives 16 is easier, no doubt about it.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on March 25, 2006, 10:19:00 am
Who said jungle 53 is hard? :p
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Jimbo on March 26, 2006, 04:37:00 am
Archives is a far shorter level that yields far more accuracy in strafing and a more disciplined approach to how you complete the level. Jungle is harder but not as strict. Archives levels are my weakness, so I'll take Jungle ANY day.
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: Wouter Jansen on March 26, 2006, 08:00:00 am
Aren't you the one always bragging about your superior  accuracy? :p
Title: Hardest World Record?
Post by: RK on March 26, 2006, 11:01:00 pm
I'd say both are extreamly hard...Havent really tried on either of the levels..I'd prolly pic Archives A 16.