The Elite Forum

Nonsense Time => FFA => Topic started by: DYM on March 26, 2017, 04:33:52 am

Title: At what point should a video be rejected for having quality "too good"?
Post by: DYM on March 26, 2017, 04:33:52 am

The thought occurred to me when Eliza posted a video showcasing the quality from a new ultraHDMI kit which prevents the standard digital-analog conversion for video capturing as in most capture cards. Unfortunately I deem the quality too good for proof. See for yourself:

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/131295480

We should really make this clear before someone comes along with emulator-like quality on a console before drama ensues as evident in the past. The proof policy does not touch upon this.

Post away! :nesquik:

Title: Re: At what point should a video be rejected for having quality "too good"?
Post by: deletedprofile.u on March 26, 2017, 05:08:11 am

No.

Title: Re: At what point should a video be rejected for having quality "too good"?
Post by: Spec on March 26, 2017, 04:24:45 pm

Yes, we should. It's a clear case of injustice against lower social classes who can only afford things like a dazzle or gv-usb2 and free recording programs on a cheap computer. We must cap the quality on the high end as well to impede the bourgeoisie oppression that would eventually elitize the elite to only their quality standards.