Keith Primeau & Game 4 ECSF also disagrees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHGMqXQEfw4&feature=related(Side note: more Prims heroism (goal I mentioned above)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNkl8uX_XaU&feature=relatedThere is nothing "bad" or "boring" about watching sudden death hockey, no matter how conservative the players play due to potential fatigue as the game moves on. You're on the edge of your seat the entire time.
I never said I wanted limitless OT for regular season NHL games. 4 on 4 is fine for here, but at least make it 10 or 20m. After that, (and we're talking a very slim chance of this if you look at playoff OT statistics-- and those are 5 skaters a piece), I'd prefer ties over shootouts, that's for damn sure. Without shootouts, the Florida Panthers make the playoffs last year in lieu of NYR. Without shootouts, the 2007-8 Hurricanes go in to the playoffs as a #3 seed rather than completely miss the playoffs (Capitals bumped down to #7 seed in lieu of Bruins who'd miss)! Pure idiocy that something with nothing to do with team hockey can make such a huge difference in the standings. That's right, NHL, your genius system kept out two teams where you are trying to grow more support. GJ! Shootouts are as sensible as having each team's top three fighters duke it out with the refs scoring the fights... only much less entertaining. Let's overhaul the NFL rules to have RB's with two OTs try to score from the 10 against a group of 3 LBs, Madden training camp style.
And judging by your last comment, it would seem that you correctly hold the belief that a losing team can outplay a winning team. That said, I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion of Canada outplaying USA in GMG. For almost the entire third period they let go of the throttle, falling back into a defensive shell mode (that was ultimately dooming for them, temporarily anyway). So the USA couldn't establish their powerplay. PP conversion for top teams in the NHL rarely cracks 25 %. Plenty of PP go by without much offensive zone time or even any SOG. The Canadians had the correct scheme for thwarting zone entry (conversely the Americans had the incorrect scheme for gaining the zone). This does not an entire game make.
Of course, I wouldn't go so far as to say the Americans outplayed Canada either. But other than the brief amount of OT played, I'd definitely consider the game evenly played. This is why I want a 7 game series RIGHT NOW. (And damn it if Mike Richards never makes that hustle play on the first goal, we may not have even gone to OT. Still <3 Mike Richards tho)
But what I really don't get is the Canada was best team throughout the tourney argument, after they tied Switzerland, lost to what was at the time, a written-off USA, and played poorly enough to have to face Slovakia in OT in an elimination game. What would have been a 10m OT w/ shootout BTW. Goose can tell you all about Slovakia's star power in that scary scenario!
Anyway, I'm glad Canada won instead of most other teams. I made a loonie or toonie off of it (money was where my mouth was pre-tourney). I also was rooting for them as my #4, behind USA, Czech, and Slovakia. I have heritage from Czechoslovakia, but I don't know which half! So just root for both I guess =P
Definitely glad they ousted Russia, and also glad no girly Scandinavian teams won. I needed hitting in the finals, and that's what I got.
OK probably should stop debating hockey points with eliters soon.