Poll

Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?

Yes, it should remain a WR
16 (66.7%)
No, it should not count anymore
4 (16.7%)
Undecided
4 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 24

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?  (Read 943 times)

simmen6

  • Posts: 46
Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« on: October 21, 2014, 08:14:37 am »
Vote :)
Logged

flicker

  • Posts: 1938
    • Flickerform
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • 2016RankingsDev
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2018RankingsDev
    • 2020RankingsDev
    • 2021RankingsDev
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2014, 08:17:14 am »
Archives vs Duel

No, I dont see much to compare here...

16 should obviously count as a WR

(let the  :kappa:  :nesquik: begin)
Logged

OHMSS

  • Posts: 2253
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2014, 10:24:53 am »
Irrel poll because 15 will happen. 52 too.
Logged

deletedprofile.u

  • Posts: 1
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2014, 12:04:35 pm »
15 won't happen, 52 will. Irrel post imo. Just because many people tie a record doesn't mean it should no longer count as one. It still takes a considerable amount of skill for 16.
Logged

speedruntrainer

  • Posts: 2507
    • SRT
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • Twitter
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2014, 12:43:28 pm »
Simmen6, where's your Archives 16?
Or are you stuck on Duel? :kappa:

Should it count as a poll? :nesquik: :kappa: :kappa: :nesquik:
Logged
As much cheating as Henning did in GE I don't think he had any time left over to cheat on his GF. - Illu

Marc&Ryan aren't streaming, but I bet they're practicing holes. - Wouter Jansen
Converter is official from Denmark. - DavidK519

Rigger in Chief

  • Posts: 852
  • SC Host
    • Austin Perroux
    • GE
    • twitch
    • 2016CommunityContributor
    • 2017CommunityContributor
    • 2018CommunityContributor
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2014, 02:04:28 am »
The day I get Archives 16 is the day it's no longer a WR
Logged
Rigging Contests One Round at a Time

Spec

  • Posts: 1220
    • Spec
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2014, 12:56:01 am »
Austin be like "don't dequalify it as a WR, please, I'm already 550 hours deep into this shit... have mercy"
Logged

OHMSS

  • Posts: 2253
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2014, 11:04:53 am »
Quote from: Alec McDonald on October 21, 2014, 12:04:35 pm
15 won't happen

I am talking more like in the next 10 years. Yes 15 sounds insane, but probably not as insane as the thought of Chicago 14 or B2 23 was in 2005. Mind you 16 was done with 1.2 0:1, 2:0 runs are rare but real, and 2.x has the potential to save even a tad more because you can start the slap early. Mix in a mega yolo Nat door and there you have it :nesquik:
Logged

Rigger in Chief

  • Posts: 852
  • SC Host
    • Austin Perroux
    • GE
    • twitch
    • 2016CommunityContributor
    • 2017CommunityContributor
    • 2018CommunityContributor
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2014, 08:29:11 pm »
Quote from: Future top 10 of top-10-lists-potential (Spec) on October 25, 2014, 12:56:01 am
Austin be like "don't dequalify it as a WR, please, I'm already 550 hours deep into this shit... have mercy"

this
Logged
Rigging Contests One Round at a Time

Rigger in Chief

  • Posts: 852
  • SC Host
    • Austin Perroux
    • GE
    • twitch
    • 2016CommunityContributor
    • 2017CommunityContributor
    • 2018CommunityContributor
Re: Should Archives A 0:16 count as a WR?
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2014, 03:07:54 am »
k just let Archives 16 sit as WR for about 6 months and your good  :pimp:
Logged
Rigging Contests One Round at a Time
Pages: [1]
« previous next »