Author Topic: Top 100 No Proof Ranks  (Read 1120 times)

Saint Shang

  • Posts: 701
Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« on: March 11, 2018, 06:39:50 pm »
After being with the Elite a few years and having seen some controversy regarding the ranks, I thought it'd be good to finally see some stats about No Proof Points.

This is a work in progress, so errors may be present. If the images are too grainy or small I'll have to adjust them when I can. I will try and add more stats as time permits.

I was hoping that other members could help fill in the gaps and create a list of why any of these top 100 don't have proof.
I've added a colour scheme to kinda help find an easier way of sifting the wheat from the chaff.

I'm aware of the Stats thread, but this info does merit it's own thread given it's possible value to mods and the community as a whole. (I hope)



RANK



AGENT



SECRET AGENT



00 AGENT



TOTAL



NO VID POINTS (number of times worth points with no Vids)


« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 03:38:37 pm by TheFlash »

falzy211

  • Posts: 56
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2018, 06:44:28 pm »
The answer is probably either

The video was removed or link broke or

They set times back when video proof wasn't needed.

Alka Maass

  • Posts: 709
  • Defense Strat Maasster
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • 2020RankingsDev
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2018, 10:19:19 pm »
I assume Taka had proof in the past for his GE videos but deleted them all?

AZ

  • Posts: 6238
    • AxZ
    • 2015CommunityContributor
    • 2017SilverStar
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2018, 05:20:49 am »
That is correct, he had proof for almost all his times before he deleted his YouTube-channel.

flukey lukey

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 6844
  • Zero-Time P.O.M.
    • Luke
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • 2018FantasyChamps
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2018, 09:37:36 am »
this is a cool concept and im sure its been well documented and accurate, but the presentation is quite poor and makes it hard to read

LAS

#TeamLevelRotation

DYM

  • Posts: 7061
    • Ace
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2017CommunityContributor
    • 2018CommunityContributor
    • 2018FantasyChamps
    • 2020SilverStar
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2018, 09:55:29 am »
Poor presentation, ugly colors, cut-off text and worst of all incorrect information (first row alone - it's missing Clemens' Egypt SA record).

Read a book on data visualization.

vitorr

  • Posts: 310
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2018RankingsDev
    • 2019FantasyChamps
    • 2020RankingsDev
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2018, 03:35:40 pm »
You could just recreate those in Google Drive and share with everyone, will be easier to visualize and maybe do some changes. Interesting info tho.

TheFlash

  • Posts: 3404
Re: Top 100 No Proof Ranks
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2018, 03:40:24 pm »
this is a cool concept and im sure its been well documented and accurate, but the presentation is quite poor and makes it hard to read



I updated the links from resized and unreadable preview links that click to offsite to inlined full quality links that click to a zoom level.

You could just recreate those in Google Drive and share with everyone, will be easier to visualize and maybe do some changes. Interesting info tho.

Highly recommended.

Where can I petition the moderators to make posting data in image format a bannable offense? :D