Author Topic: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here  (Read 36901 times)

chuck

  • Posts: 644
    • GE
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #200 on: March 01, 2013, 01:27:43 pm »
Congratz on first! =)

I wanted that, just needed Air Force DLTK but its not that easy as it seems (Mr. Blonde use unlimited ammo - no reloads cheat i guess :P )

Now i have more motivation to play DLTK too!

Edit

Lowered my invest ltk to 6:16, video later
« Last Edit: March 01, 2013, 02:29:58 pm by chuck »
" it's not like we need David when we have Rayan... " - Wouter Jansen

"The only Hall Goose and Clemens should be inducted into is the Hall of Lame." - Karl Jobst

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #201 on: March 02, 2013, 06:10:02 am »
Hm... Well... In fact, every Dark LTK is harder than it looks :P. Well, My strat for the Mr Blondes is quite consistent, if I remember:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD-ctDT_6Lg&feature=context-gau
Anyway, nice to see Dak LTK activity :P. I'll try to complete all 20 possible levels as I have a bit of free time. If I just count the stages that I haven't completed yet, the easiest ones are Defection, Investigation, Infiltration, Cras Site and Deep Sea. The rest aren't that easy.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

chuck

  • Posts: 644
    • GE
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #202 on: March 02, 2013, 06:45:26 am »
thanks =) i already watched your video haahha

i done MBR already, pretty easy =)

i dont have enough patience to DLTK but will keep playing anyway!
" it's not like we need David when we have Rayan... " - Wouter Jansen

"The only Hall Goose and Clemens should be inducted into is the Hall of Lame." - Karl Jobst

Wouter Jansen

  • Posts: 8968
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • 2014RankingsDev
    • 2015RankingsDev
    • 2016RankingsDev
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #203 on: March 02, 2013, 09:46:16 am »
I'll try to complete all 20 possible levels as I have a bit of free time.

Make the 21st possible!!! :D
sexy, this

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #204 on: July 17, 2013, 11:19:38 am »
pelagic ii 9:24
edit: 4:55
Might try to sub 4:00
« Last Edit: July 17, 2013, 07:39:51 pm by ZAZKEN »

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #205 on: July 18, 2013, 02:17:58 pm »
Nice Artur! Wanna see that sub 4:00 soon :)
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #206 on: July 19, 2013, 05:44:35 am »
Thanks :)
Pelagic II 4:14, some stucks speech skip fail but nice in the rest

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #207 on: July 19, 2013, 07:07:37 am »
AFO 2:47 first accomplishment

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #208 on: July 19, 2013, 01:31:01 pm »
Pelagic 2 - LTK - 5:03. From 5:30. Very safe strat.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Selenium Webdriver

  • Posts: 3859
    • Ace
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2017CommunityContributor
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #209 on: July 21, 2013, 07:43:25 am »
G5 Building LTK 0:52

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #210 on: July 21, 2013, 12:58:15 pm »
OMG, Rayan!! Great time o_O  :o.

Pelagic 2 - LTK - 3:23.
From 5:03. Took just 10 minutes. Quite easy level :p. I used a safe strat for the beginning, so the time can still be improved :). I'll post the video in the video topic as I upload it.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #211 on: July 23, 2013, 10:12:19 am »
Duel LTK 0:09 :nesquik:

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #212 on: July 26, 2013, 09:14:58 am »
Chicago LTK 2:33 - played by safe just for accomplishment

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #213 on: July 26, 2013, 12:26:00 pm »
Nice Artur, keep going!! :)

Investigation - LTK - 6:51.
From 9:20. Not bad. Video soon.

Extraction - LTK - 3:26.
From 3:42. Loool, I was trying to do a speedrun here and I didn't even beat my Dark LTK o_O. Lol, it makes me think I did a good job on that e.e. Video soon.

G5 - LTK - 2:37.
From 3:45. After failing many sub 2:30s, I got this one. I'll improve it, since I used a safe strat. Video soon.

Ok, I'll keep trying to proof all my LTKs. Well, Duel 10 will be impossible with my controller, but there are 20 left e.e.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #214 on: July 28, 2013, 12:02:05 pm »
G5 Building - LTK - 2:00.
From 2:37. I expected sub 2, but it's okay. I'll improve it  more. Video later.

CI - LTK - 2:20.
From 3:05, I think. Crappy end due to Carrington's speed speaking... But at least now it's better than my Dark LTK.

Skedar Ruins - LTK - 2:23.
From 2:30. Well, I can still improve this a lot. Video later.

War! - LTK - 1:25.
From 1:32. Lol end, I got out of ammo on the Calisto being next to 2 Skedars o_O. Video later.

4th in the LTK rankings (times and points) e.e.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Selenium Webdriver

  • Posts: 3859
    • Ace
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2017CommunityContributor
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #215 on: July 28, 2013, 12:15:28 pm »
wow its amazing

you should become LTK champ too, then you will become LTK + DLTK (dual) champ! :nesquik:

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #216 on: July 28, 2013, 12:24:25 pm »
:nesquik: :kappa: I'll try... e.e But after watching your G5 52, Investigation in 4 minutes, Pelagic in 2, War in 1, etc., I don't have much to do e.e  :kappa: Plus, Boss, Illu, Taka, and more players have really good times...
« Last Edit: July 28, 2013, 01:22:50 pm by Deep-Darkness »
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

chuck

  • Posts: 644
    • GE
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #217 on: July 28, 2013, 03:53:03 pm »
is it just for me that auto-aim seems to not work on LTK? :)
" it's not like we need David when we have Rayan... " - Wouter Jansen

"The only Hall Goose and Clemens should be inducted into is the Hall of Lame." - Karl Jobst

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #218 on: July 29, 2013, 01:58:48 pm »
It works in MBR, but it alwais aims to Cass  :nesquik: :kappa:. Well, LTK auto-aim is a shit, I agree...

Villa - LTK - 6:28.
From 8:17. Not bad. Too safe strat.

Air Base - LTK - 4:37.
From 5:14. Lol, still worse than my Dark LTK... Well, here I used Dragons instead of Mines... Well, I may go for lower, but not now.

AFO - LTK - 1:39.
From 2:29. Really good, considering I have 1:35 in PA  :nesquik:. The time is near maxed to me, but I think I can get it lower... The problem is that those 2 Mr Blondes have perfect reflects, and they start shoting before seeing you... u.u...

MBR - LTK - 2:17.
From 2:30, I think. Horrible time, horrible Cass, etc. Still worse than my Dark LTK. Same as in SOS, just wanted a proof, but I won't speedrun this one in some time, I think... Well, I'll eventually go for a lower time than my Dark LTK.

Maian SOS - LTK - 6:23.
From 7:10. Bad run, but crazy end :p. I haven't ever liked this stage, so I'll be some time without trying to speedrun it... Only was going for a proof of my PR. Anyway, I have failed many sub 6:00.

Also, I finally managed to repeat my Chicago LTK 0:56, which is very harder than what I remember from 2009...

I'll post the video proofs  in the video topic as I upload them to YouTube.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #219 on: July 30, 2013, 12:37:41 pm »
Rescue - LTK - 8:25.
From 14:38. Bad, since I have failed many sub 8:00, but nice to see a 6 min improvement  :v.

Escape - LTK - 4:47.
From 5:10. Very slow ending. Harder than what I thought...

Crash Site - LTK - 4:06.
From 5:05. I did need to shot 4 or 5 times to explode that ship... I may go for sub 4.

Deep Sea - LTK - 6:26.
From 8:31. I'm glad with this time for now.

Also, yesterday I wrote wrong one of my times, it is really MBR LTK 2:16.

I'm uploading the videos to YouTube, I'll post them after in the video topic. With these, 17/21 LTKs are proven. The only ones left:
Defection 2:15: I'll try it today, but I'm not consistent falling on the computer.
Infiltration 7:47: There is always a stupid guy that appears behind me and kills me...
Attack Ship 6:51: Uh, that huge room at the beginning is hard...
Duel 0:10: Impossible with my controller, so I'll just try to proof the other 20 levels.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Selenium Webdriver

  • Posts: 3859
    • Ace
    • 2017RankingsDev
    • 2017CommunityContributor
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #220 on: July 30, 2013, 01:39:28 pm »
Pelagic II LTK 2:04

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #221 on: July 31, 2013, 02:27:05 pm »
Awesome job, Ace, as always :o.

Defection - LTK - 2:07.
From 2:15. Lol, I have 2:04 in PA with a different strat :S. Anyway, bad time, but since I hate Defection and doing this took me a while, I don't think I'll go for lower in a while.

Infiltration - LTK - 7:21.
From 7:47. Bad run, but at least improvement. It has costed a lot to me to find out a consistent strat... In fact I have found today a much more consistent strat for the Dark LTK, so I may go for its completion eventually. I have failed many sub 7:00 in the LTK by being killed at the end, and this one took me >2 hours (I had to find the strat), so I won't improve it for now. Maybe in future.

Attach Ship - LTK - 6:42.
Used Chuck's strat for the big room, since I was tired of failing the mission always there. The run was slow, but at least, an improvement.

Also, I have failed a Duel LTK 0:09/0:10 in Trent (I would say 0:09, but I don't think 9 is possible with my controller's stick, so it may be 10), and since I wanted to proof my completion, I did tape a 0:12 (non PR), so as I upload the proofs, I will finally have proved 21 LTK completions and 20 PRs :). Next step, 20 Dark LTKs and 20 LTKs in GE (this one will take me longer, since I'm still not used to that game... Levels are still very hard to me on 00A and some of them in SA o_O)
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Cyberwrath87

  • Posts: 1496
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #222 on: July 31, 2013, 09:39:50 pm »
Decided to play some LTK for about 30 min for the first time in years. I had previously only tried/played Investigation and Skedar.

Pelagic 2 - LTK - 6:09
Extraction - LTK: 4:43

Not rushing or anything, just having fun and trying to beat the level for the first time on LTK. Tried G5 for about 10 min but kept dying in the 2nd room, lol.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #223 on: August 01, 2013, 01:31:24 pm »
The strat I used in my 3:58 Dark LTK is almost 100% consistent, and with it, you don't need to do that room =p. The video is on the PD LTK ankings. If you try it and you have problems with it, just tell me and I'll try to make a "How to..." video ;).
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #224 on: August 03, 2013, 01:18:08 pm »
I think I'm starting to like LTKs a lot :D. It's strange that completing them fast is easier than completing them in a slow/safe way :nesquik:. Well, some new PRs:

Extraction - LTK - 2:53.
From 3:26. Better now, but still slow. Used Mg's strat.

G5 - LTK - 1:29.
From 2:00. Not bad time, but slow run imo. Going for lower.

Air Base - LTK - 4:07.
From 4:37. Better now, but still very slow, considering I have failed sub 4:00 on Dark LTK many times...

Crash Site - LTK - 3:07.
From 4:06. Not bad run, but going for sub 3:00. Plus, dogs started barking...

Pelagic 2 - LTK - 3:07.
From 3:23. It had to be sub 3:00, but I found some random guards at the end that made me lose the time... Going for lower.

Skedar Ruins - LTK - 2:19.
From 2:23. I'll improve this soon... I lost a lot of time at the end, and I accidentally gave my Calisto instead of my Falcon 2 for that objective, so slow end...

MBR - LTK - 1:55.
From 2:16. Nice, but Cass is stupid and very slow... Well, not sure if I'll go for lower here in a while.

I'll post the videos on the video topic as soon as I upload them to YouTube.
Ranked 3rd in points and time in the LTK ranks :nesquik:
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #225 on: August 17, 2013, 10:23:03 am »
Yesterday morning I didn't have my N64, so I played a bit of the Xboox version. I caked a Crash Site LTK 2:52 in the first try, so that gave me inspiration enough to do that level on N64:
Crash Site - LTK - 2:45.
From 3:07. I used same strat as Boss, Funky, Taka, ... I thought it was harder, though. I lost many seconds during the run, I go stuck with my stupid hoverbike, and I did shot 3 time to destroy the ship, so I'll go for lower.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 10:28:21 am by Deep-Darkness »
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #226 on: August 29, 2013, 12:49:52 pm »
Ok, having a break of GE LTKs:
Investigation - LTK - 5:46.
From 6:51, I think. Not bad, but once I got a faster bot, which would have been sub 5.

Extraction - LTK - 2:52.
From 2:53. Not a great improvement here XD. Well, lost seconds at the end, so going for lower.

Infiltration - LTK - 6:44.
From 7:21. It could have been faster... I think I can do sub 6 with a similar strat. Not sure though...

Rescue - LTK - 6:54.
From 8:25. Very slow beginning. Also, I failed a sub 6 attempt because I walked on a Dragon I had droped... :S... Well, I may go for lower.

Deep Sea - LTK - 5:30.
From 6:26. Very slow at the beginning... I think sub 5 is doable to me...

Skedar Ruins - LTK - 1:57.
From 2:19. Not bad, but still not great.

Proofs later. Lol, even with this, I'm still ranked 3rd... I'll work harder next time.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #227 on: August 30, 2013, 04:24:00 am »
Some more PRs:
Extraction - LTK - 2:46.
From 2:52. PAL UWR when set, and 97 points. Even considering I can save some seconds, 2:31 is not possible with this strat in PAL, so I really think now NTSC has a lot of advantage here. Maybe it's just for the lifts or something...

Rescue - LTK - 6:04.
From 6:54. Better, but not great. Sub 6 pace :(...

Deep Sea - LTK - 5:12.
From 5:30. Like Rescue, better but not great yet.

Carrington Institute - LTK - 2:18.
From 2:20. Very slow end due to Carrington's texts. Obviously, it can get lower.

Proofs later. Ranked 2nd in points :).
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #228 on: September 04, 2013, 05:14:35 am »
Yesterday I decided to test my webcam, and I got:
Infiltration - LTK - 5:24.
From 6:44. Not bad.

With this, I'm ranked 2nd in LTK times too... I just have to beat Mg in points and Justin Thomas in times...
About the video, it's very nice to be recordered with a Webcam, so I may use it these days a bit (next week uni starts, so I'll have to stop playing till next holidays probably).
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

404

  • Posts: 2079
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #229 on: September 04, 2013, 06:43:49 am »
A webcam is not nice for recording gameplay in 2013, in fact it's shit. Get some actual capture equipment which is probably even cheaper than your cam.

Btw congrats on your great (D)LTK achievements. I don't really that league but I still think it's really cool that you're doing work there :)

Al Gore

  • Posts: 2508
    • SRT
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • Twitter
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #230 on: September 04, 2013, 07:49:47 am »
Yes, as I said in the other topic, it's way cheaper. I got a decent capture card for €35,- in an electronic store and got recording software with it.
I believe that there are capture cards for $10 on ebay, not sure if recording software is with it though.

Most capture cards also supports NTSC, so you don't have to worry about your future NTSC system :)
« Last Edit: September 04, 2013, 11:45:32 am by speedruntrainer »
As much cheating as Henning did in GE I don't think he had any time left over to cheat on his GF. - Illu

Marc&Ryan aren't streaming, but I bet they're practicing holes. - Wouter Jansen
Converter is official from Denmark. - DavidK519

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #231 on: September 04, 2013, 09:45:15 am »
I know it's a shit, but nothing is cheaper than wasting 0 euros. Anyway, I have seen my video, and it didn't seem that bad to me. It's just like a non-high quality camera, but both audio and video are okay imo (I'll post the video later, so that people can at least see what I say...). Also, every text can be read this way...

Of course, I plan to buy a capture card in future, but not now for 2 reasons mainly:
1) I don't have money at the moment.
2) I'll start both university and music school in 5 days, and I'll have to stop playing... Even if I bought it today, it wouldn't arrive that soon...

Anyway, as I said in another topic, these days that I'm using a webcam, I'm not giving my best, with the hope that I ever beat the times recording with a deent camera/capture card. That's why I stopped speedrunning in A/SA/PA (I have a bunch of crappy times to improve on both games, but don't wanna play them without at least a decent camera).
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

404

  • Posts: 2079
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #232 on: September 04, 2013, 01:57:44 pm »
Sorry Oscar, I wouldn't have made such a rude post had I seen your post in the video topic from two days ago before. I'm well aware of the circumstances the spanish youth has to deal with and fully understand your hesitation about wasting money.
I thought you just bought a cam for the sole purpose of serving as your future capture solution, which would be a really dumb thing nowadays in my book.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #233 on: September 04, 2013, 03:26:24 pm »
np, man ;). Anyway, yeah, in future I plan to buy a capture card. I think I have some times that are worth to be on a capture card video instead of a camera one.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

chuck

  • Posts: 644
    • GE
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #234 on: September 04, 2013, 08:13:26 pm »
at least its very hard to fake webcam videos 8)

i like webcam videos anyway
" it's not like we need David when we have Rayan... " - Wouter Jansen

"The only Hall Goose and Clemens should be inducted into is the Hall of Lame." - Karl Jobst

Adam_B

  • Posts: 225
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #235 on: September 06, 2013, 05:57:49 pm »

chuck

  • Posts: 644
    • GE
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #236 on: September 06, 2013, 06:41:00 pm »
my life would be much better if i could do the OBJ 1 area like you :P

if i remember right i died many times there when trying G5 LTK
" it's not like we need David when we have Rayan... " - Wouter Jansen

"The only Hall Goose and Clemens should be inducted into is the Hall of Lame." - Karl Jobst

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #237 on: September 11, 2013, 09:23:52 am »
Ok, this morning I was bored:

Villa - LTK - 4:37.
From 6:28. Riskier strat, but going for lower.

Air Base - LTK - 3:49.
From 4:07. I'll improve it.

Crash Site - LTK - 2:24.
From 2:45. Not bad.

CI - LTK - 2:13.
From 2:18. Very slow end + safe strat at some points... Going for lower.

Attack Ship - LTK - 5:35.
From 6:42. Not bad improvement :kappa:. Used Chuck's great strat for the big room :).

Proofs tomorrow. Also, I finally got a proof of Duel LTK 0:10, so 21/21 LTKs proven.

With these times, I'm now ranked 1st in both LTK points and LTK times :). So with that, I'm the PD LTK/DLTK champion till a top eliter decides to beat me :kappa:. I still remember a month ago when Rayan told me to try this... Then I thought I wasn't able :D.

Next goals on PD LTKs: sub 1 hour total time and a 100% LTK run with no deaths :kappa:.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

Al Gore

  • Posts: 2508
    • SRT
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
    • Twitter
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #238 on: September 11, 2013, 09:51:08 am »
^LTK Strat Master :kappa: :kappa: :kappa:

Very nice PRs and achievement, congratulations for champion!!!

Wow, an LTK deathless 100% Run would be amazing! :D :D :D
As much cheating as Henning did in GE I don't think he had any time left over to cheat on his GF. - Illu

Marc&Ryan aren't streaming, but I bet they're practicing holes. - Wouter Jansen
Converter is official from Denmark. - DavidK519

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #239 on: September 11, 2013, 02:18:29 pm »
Thanks you :D. Yeah, that run would be amazing :kappa:... But too hard... Defection with glitch is very random, and without is very hard, and it's the first one... No need to talk about other 20 levels :kappa:. So yes, I'll try it :kappa: :nesquik:.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

barsam2

  • Posts: 33
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #240 on: September 12, 2013, 04:46:48 am »
yeah, that would blow everyone's mind, an all level LTK run...  :)  :smokin:

Adam_B

  • Posts: 225
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #241 on: September 12, 2013, 08:06:25 am »
Congrats on your #1 ranking Óscar :)

A 100% run without dying would be fun to try. I've tried that on GE before but kept dying on Surface 1. Maybe doing runs where you are allowed to restart the level if you die would be better and you work out your overall time using real time at the end like people do on full normal mode speedruns.


Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #242 on: September 12, 2013, 02:40:29 pm »
Thanks :p. Yeah, that would be nice (it's not nice with a webcam though :kappa:), but even doing that, I want to do a deathless run :kappa: :nesquik:. Today I have tested it... I did Defection, Investigation, Extraction and Villa in a row, but some troll did shot me on Chicago. The hardest levels to do this will probably be Chicago, AFO, CI and Maian SOS. Also, you have to be lucky in MBR and War. Well, I'll keep going.

Anyway, I have had problems with 3 of the 6 videos I did yesterday, so I decided to repeat the levels, and did:
Villa - LTK - 4:31.
From 4:37. Decent run, but lost a lot of time.

Air Base - LTK - 3:37.
From 3:49. After failing many times ~3:00 runs, I decided to do a safe end. Also, I use the safe start, since I'm very bad with the PA one (alarm sounds 99% of times, and I die the rest of times).

Duel - LTK - 0:10.
From 0:10 :kappa: :kappa:. Well, simply, repeated it :kappa: :nesquik:. I have to say that first 2 objectives were great, and would have given me a high 6 or a low 7... I'm not sure if 0:06 is possible with a 0:03.0x obj 1 though.

I'll try to upload the videos tomorrow.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

AZ

  • Posts: 5796
    • AxZ
    • 2015CommunityContributor
    • 2017SilverStar
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #243 on: October 13, 2013, 07:07:59 pm »
Crash Site LTK 3:19
Extraction LTK 3:47
Villa LTK 11:33
  :nesquik:

ZAZKEN

  • Posts: 284
    • GE
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #244 on: October 14, 2013, 11:40:40 am »
Congrats AxZ :)

CI 2:52 was easier than I thought :p

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #245 on: October 14, 2013, 02:46:26 pm »
Maybe our strats are different, but I wouldn't say CI is an easy LTK, lol... After getting the RCP120, a million guards in random possition go and kill you e.e :nesquik:. But yeah, not that hard with a safe strat :p.

Congrats, Axel and Artur!
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.

AZ

  • Posts: 5796
    • AxZ
    • 2015CommunityContributor
    • 2017SilverStar
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #246 on: October 17, 2013, 07:57:29 pm »
WAR! LTK 1:31  :nesquik:

AZ

  • Posts: 5796
    • AxZ
    • 2015CommunityContributor
    • 2017SilverStar
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #247 on: October 29, 2013, 07:02:19 pm »
Deep Sea LTK 8:38
Attack Ship LTK 6:56
Rescue LTK 14:31  8)
Infiltration LTK 9:20
Defection LTK 5:52


obviously just going for completions. Defection was the hardest of these imo (all because of the ending).

with this, I've beaten all levels on LTK in both GE and PD :)

OO

  • Posts: 1296
  • Retired?
    • PD
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #248 on: November 20, 2013, 05:24:58 am »
I did a G5 LTK 1:04 yesterday. Piece of cake level really, not that much different than playing normal mode.

Didn't bother recording though.

Deep-Darkness

  • Posts: 1285
  • DD, AKA The Ace Slayer
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Re: Post New LTK PRs/Discussion here
« Reply #249 on: January 23, 2014, 09:44:15 am »
Rescue - LTK - 4:40.
From 6:04. Easy :nesquik:.
Let A be a pizza of radius z and height a. Its volume is V_A = pi·(z^2)·a = pizza.