Author Topic: Post New WR Discussion Here  (Read 8007 times)

Jugador

  • Guest
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #300 on: April 05, 2004, 11:41:00 pm »
There won't be a vid unless he gets it again. But yes, you're right.

Your Eliteness

  • Posts: 1639
    • GE
    • PD
    • 2020RankingsDev
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #301 on: April 06, 2004, 12:06:00 am »
Chicago A 0:15
March 29th, 2004
0:10.65 case pickup
PAL
 
Infiltration SA 1:36
March 29th, 2004
PAL
 
Infiltration SA 1:35
March 30th, 2004
0:12.9 black line
0:26 black line
0:35/0:36 hole
0:53 lift press
1:09.0 ramp
High 1:19 lift shut
1:35.66 end
PAL
 
Infiltration PA 1:52
April 2nd, 2004
High 0:35 line
Low 0:48 "shield"
Low 1:08 lift press
Mid 1:36 lift shut
1:52.61 end
PAL
 
MBR PA 1:29
April 4th, 2004
0:44.51 guard kill
0:47 disarm
0:49 Cass moving
High 1:03 through top door
1:16 Cass on rooftop
1:21 Cass on ramp
Low 1:29 end
NTSC

..

  • Posts: 2042
    • 2014RankingsDev
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #302 on: April 06, 2004, 12:20:00 am »
Whoarding = gay... especially when its a shitty whoard like that...

Your Eliteness

  • Posts: 1639
    • GE
    • PD
    • 2020RankingsDev
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #303 on: April 06, 2004, 12:35:00 am »
"Whoarding = gay"
That's your personal opinion. And in your mind everything is gay so I'm not surprised.

"especially when its a shitty whoard like that"
I did it during one week for the experience. It's hard to keep new WRs a secret. And I won't do it again.

I don't care if this disqualifies me from POM, I gave you the dates of the PRs and you'll see the vids soon anyway. Besides, Karl will win it because everyone sucks up to him.

SadisticMystic1

  • Posts: 24
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #304 on: April 06, 2004, 12:58:00 am »
Also...Look!  Square 5!

Can't blow it up to ungodly sizes until a video comes, though...

On a side note, 1:52 needs to fall.  Soon.

genisics

  • Posts: 1243
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #305 on: April 06, 2004, 01:11:00 am »
:lol , ye, why such a bad sport? karl had you beaten for pom, so you whoard, get urself disquaulified, and then say he'd only have won because everyone sucks up to him?.. get over urself, it's a @#%$ video game.

..

  • Posts: 2042
    • 2014RankingsDev
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #306 on: April 06, 2004, 01:53:00 am »
<3 genisics

Also, Pictures still prove nothing... lets see vids now.. go prove yourself completely since Wouter pwns you hardcore now

Jugador

  • Guest
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #307 on: April 06, 2004, 02:44:00 am »
Karl or Ryan or myself will murder 152. Don't worry about that one.

On a side note... Ryan is weak for unwhoarding so soon. WeakyMcWeak.

edit: just a spelling error which made things not make sense.

Jugador

  • Guest
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #308 on: April 06, 2004, 02:46:00 am »
Wow! Input from the original Come-mister. Pictures prove nothing. Wow, did you invent that yourself? Why are you saying it anyway?

SimThreat

  • Posts: 4521
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #309 on: April 06, 2004, 06:34:00 am »
Oh no, I will never catch ye now.

pwned.

-K..

vitor

  • Posts: 3644
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #310 on: April 06, 2004, 01:32:00 pm »
10.6 equipment on Chicago, that sounds preety good. Disco had something like 10.8.

Good job. And screw the whoard, he's got the records, that's what matters.

ExpertGamer64

  • Posts: 3457
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #311 on: April 06, 2004, 03:04:00 pm »
My best case is 10.66 :x .

SXR

  • Posts: 354
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #312 on: April 06, 2004, 06:31:00 pm »
Normal run, but messed up the end.

TTs:

12.5 press
16.2 open
22.4 closed
29.71 skip
45.38 skip
52.45 cutscene
1:03.4 door after blondes
1:05.9 door to escape pod
1:08 release laptop
1:10 going back up

Door to where you throw the mine was open, but I messed up killing the guard and then the door at the end

Should have been at least 1:28

vitor

  • Posts: 3644
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #313 on: April 07, 2004, 09:41:00 am »
You are about to pass me :rolleyes

I don't want to play again. Damn it.

Narigutita

  • Posts: 1070
    • twitch
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #314 on: April 07, 2004, 03:54:00 pm »
My best case pickup was 10.80, that was on my 16, but never could do that again :\
-Narigutita

Phil-Hughes

  • Posts: 1589
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #315 on: April 09, 2004, 10:49:00 am »
Congratulation to Karl on 1:10 / 0:52 :)

Dark-Phoenix-BR

  • Posts: 277
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #316 on: April 09, 2004, 11:24:00 am »
Indeed. Congratulations, Karl!

Phil, why don't you update your times page with your "new" Attack Ship times? You would gain some points...

Phil-Hughes

  • Posts: 1589
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #317 on: April 09, 2004, 12:01:00 pm »
Yeah, and lose some time also, but it won't change my rank I don't think. I wouldn't mind my true set of times being online though.

Dark-Phoenix-BR

  • Posts: 277
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #318 on: April 09, 2004, 12:41:00 pm »
What are your times, btw? I'm guessing 2:15 Agent, 2:41 SA, ??? PA? I can't find them.

Phil-Hughes

  • Posts: 1589
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #319 on: April 12, 2004, 06:12:00 pm »
2:15 / 2:41 / 3:45

Boss

  • Posts: 4103
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #320 on: April 14, 2004, 12:40:00 am »
Reveal the CI PA strat already.  It's over 10 sec untied and stuff.

Jugador

  • Guest
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #321 on: April 14, 2004, 12:53:00 am »
nades over wall.

Djie

  • Posts: 2764
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #322 on: April 14, 2004, 01:05:00 am »
vid over net.

Boss

  • Posts: 4103
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #323 on: April 14, 2004, 01:14:00 am »
From where though?

..

  • Posts: 2042
    • 2014RankingsDev
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #324 on: April 14, 2004, 01:39:00 am »
You have a capture card, I've offered my webspace to host the vid, and you blocked me.  Maybe if the people who run the elite would even pay attention to the boards/rankings at all, you'd actually have to release the vid, but since Jon and Youse seem not to even give a @#%$ about the PD ranks, I guess we'll never see it.

Jugador

  • Guest
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #325 on: April 14, 2004, 01:40:00 am »
wtf shade. Why don't you talk after you admit you're a liar?

Bryan, Hostage room.

Djie

  • Posts: 2764
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #326 on: April 14, 2004, 01:43:00 am »
edit: I love you Matt!


Light

  • Posts: 791
  • Grand Crusader
    • Mr. Guru
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #327 on: April 14, 2004, 01:59:00 am »
wtf is going on?  Is the vid released or not?

Djie

  • Posts: 2764
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #328 on: April 14, 2004, 01:59:00 am »
not!

Djie

  • Posts: 2764
    • GE
    • PD
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #329 on: April 14, 2004, 02:23:00 am »
:rollin

Boss

  • Posts: 4103
    • GE
    • PD
    • twitch
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #330 on: April 14, 2004, 09:17:00 pm »
Thanks for clarifying the strat.  It must be insane to take out the guards and not the hostages after getting Dev, and also the safe from near the starting ramp all on the same run.  How many hours did it take to get 133 from like 149 old strat or whatever you had for it?

SXR

  • Posts: 354
Post New WR Discussion Here
« Reply #331 on: April 16, 2004, 08:29:00 pm »
For the AF1 SA time

16.0 door open
29.50 skip
44.98 skip
52.03 cutscene

bad guard killing, ok prez, ugly end

1:22.65