Author Topic: Total time (Read 930 times)

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #50 on:** April 06, 2007, 06:36:00 am »

I wouldn't say something is possible before at least a TAS has got it.. even then it's not 100% certain but at least if a TAS can't do it, you know it can't be done by humans with current strat for sure.

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #51 on:** April 06, 2007, 06:38:00 am »

in case people neglect to understand, something = an extremely difficult max that one might figure to be possible, but can't be sure of.

Thiradell · « **Reply #52 on:** April 06, 2007, 12:40:00 pm »

Sure, Bryan's times might be gotten. All except Aztec 00 1:33.

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #53 on:** April 06, 2007, 12:47:00 pm »

eventually, all times will be 0:02 or lower, it's pointless speculating anything else

flukey lukey · « **Reply #54 on:** April 06, 2007, 01:38:00 pm »

bryans times are so gay. they are Overkill. hes gone beyond the point of ridiculousness. of course we will continue to push times to the limits but hes just lost the plot completely. i say sir. Archives 0:15 will happen before 96% of those times you have listed.

RWG · « **Reply #55 on:** April 06, 2007, 02:17:00 pm »

I always get a kick out of his silo SA 1:04 pred. I know its bad to say "oh that will never happen" but just imagine my 1:04 where I pick up everything not losing time. Its just :rollin

Red Bull · « **Reply #56 on:** April 06, 2007, 02:32:00 pm »

Three years ago or something, if people would have said you were going to get 1:10 on SA someday Ryan, you would say they were crazy too

.

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #57 on:** April 06, 2007, 02:44:00 pm »

let's just say that it's gonna be 0:00, cuz common sense says that negative times aren't possible no matter what, thus 0:00 would be the safest bet!

Illu · « **Reply #58 on:** April 06, 2007, 03:07:00 pm »

I don't think we'll ever get lower than 1:15:12.

SpiderWaffle · « **Reply #59 on:** April 06, 2007, 04:22:00 pm »

There is already a TAS of 1:37 aztec 00. It sucks too. There is a good chance that the close guard can open the glass too.

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #60 on:** April 06, 2007, 04:26:00 pm »

if it sucked for you then you should be happy about it

Thiradell · « **Reply #61 on:** April 06, 2007, 08:21:00 pm »

TAS of 1:37? Yeah, that certainly proves 1:33 is possible. Especially considering it's the current Agent WR and SA is eight seconds slower. Let's just say I would be stunned if someone did SA sub-1:35.

Discombobulator11 · « **Reply #62 on:** April 07, 2007, 03:58:00 am »

I dunno too much about agent times all around, but after playing lots of b1, archives, runway, depot, and some dam A, it's clear to me that depot 25 should be as doable as maybe a 16.7 archives A. It's to the point on archives where I get like 17.00 every run, but still somehow have come short on 16, and when I get bored and want a confidence boost, I play depot 3-4 times to get a 26. I might try for 25 once I see that getting a record is possible for me :P I compare 25 depot A to chicago 15 in a way. When I got 15, 16 was readily achievable, but 15 seemed a little far off, with a few people agreeing it "might" be possible. The thing for me was, 16 was so cake that 15 must have been possible, and indeed it was, even for that short of a level. 26 depot is almost as easy to get as 17 archives, a little harder for sure, but still within the realm of consistency. I feel it's like my civil duty to get 25....but that would require playing ge more

Troublesome Moral Code · « **Reply #63 on:** April 07, 2007, 04:24:00 am »

HOLY @#%$

Did this discussion ever spiral out of control or what :lol

Good show, this is why I love this place.

vitor · « **Reply #64 on:** April 07, 2007, 08:40:00 pm »

Yeah Disco, I agree with you there on the Chicago comparison. 25 will be done very soon.

SpiderWaffle · « **Reply #65 on:** April 08, 2007, 02:15:00 am »

I hope everyone knows by now that Henrik did 25 on a TAS, no boosts or anything, just good strafing.

RWG · « **Reply #66 on:** April 08, 2007, 03:09:00 am »

yes, but also no lag due to TAS, which is key in console playing actuality.

Wouter Jansen · « **Reply #67 on:** April 08, 2007, 10:45:00 am »

who is this Henrick guy. I'm sure depot 25 was done by someone else.

Lovins · « **Reply #68 on:** April 08, 2007, 01:31:00 pm »

RK · « **Reply #69 on:** April 08, 2007, 01:44:00 pm »

Only Wouter would post that

Lovins · « **Reply #70 on:** April 08, 2007, 01:49:00 pm »

Henrick = Nate Keeper :lol

SpiderWaffle · « **Reply #71 on:** April 08, 2007, 09:14:00 pm »

I expect the new Aztec TAS to get about 1:33. Up to five seconds lower if I can get my new glass strat to work.

Thiradell · « **Reply #72 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:42:00 am »

The discussion hasn't spiralled out of control. We're talking about how much records can be lowered, and consequently how low the total time can go.

...Okay, I, a human being, am not really sure of anything. But if somebody gets Aztec 00 1:33 (legitimately, no cheats, no sharking, nothing) while I am still alive, I will grab my balls and squeeze them as hard as I can for five minutes.

RWG · « **Reply #73 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:51:00 am »

Boss · « **Reply #74 on:** April 13, 2007, 01:23:00 am »

And I don't get why people are taking times I posted a year ago so seriously. I just felt like going crazy one day and randomly making a maxed times topic putting no thought into any of the times. Silo SA 104 is not happening.

Troublesome Moral Code · « **Reply #75 on:** April 13, 2007, 01:25:00 am »

Illu · « **Reply #76 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:03:00 pm »

I like crazy too.

Fragaten 890

facility 45

Dam 55

Oblivion 560
what is there oin the doors 444445

About yesyardat sorry about it sbeceyuse it was my day rotd

thnx about Axsztec 1:24 btw

Thiradell · « **Reply #77 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:08:00 pm »

Oh. Sorry, Bryan. I didn't realize that.

News:

Author Topic: Total time (Read 930 times)